Planning Process

Data Gathering

Please review the Planning Task Force Data Gathering Plan and final documents for the results of their hard work.

Partners	Stakeholder Group	Design	How many people?	Results
Jane Schleusner Jennifer Liberty-Clark	Court Administration Judges Meeting General Psych 1110 Student Pop.	Customized Design S.W.O.T.	30 Judges 9 CA	Judges and students Gen Psych 1110

Godwin Saporu Jesse Oldenburg	High Schools Alumni	One to One interview	20 50+

Gary Cook Jill Gromberg	Student Athletes	S.W.O.T. Customized	20-30	Student Athletes

Mary Jacobson LeAnn Brown	District 11 Counselors/Career & Guidance Homeschool Leadership	S.W.O.T. Mind Map Round Table	25-30 10-15	Dist 11 Counselors

Anne Duerksen Peter DeLong	PSEO Students PSEO Parents	Interview	20 20	PSEO students PSEO parents

Cheryl Tefer Kim Lynch	Hospitals Nursing Student National Assoc.	Interview Carousel (students)	2-5 20 x 2 campuses	Nursing CC Nursing CR

John Ivansuskus Dee Dee Peaslee	4 year Business faculty HS Students - BPA	Group discussion TBD	10-20 200+ students 25 teachers	Metro State BPA

Jamie Barthel	Anoka Chamber North Branch Chamber Metro North Chamber Cambridge Chamber	Part Electronic and interview	10 interviews 100-300 Electronic Surveys	Anoka North Branch Metro North Cambridge

Tom McCarthy Kent Hanson	Advisory Committee CR Advisory Committee CC Foundation ARCC Foundation ATC	Carousel S.W.O.T. Selected Questions S.W.O.T.	45 45	Advisory CR Advisory CC Foundation CR Foundation ATC

Kelly Befus Nora Morris	Chem 1050	Interview Design	12	CR Chem 1050 02 CC Chem 1050 01 CR Chem 1050 01

Heidi Haagenson Amy Moberg	Division Chairs - ATC 3-4 ATC Program Advisory Groups	Mind Map 2-3 Questions Mind Map and or Survey	20-25 30	Program Advisory

Marc Robichaud Julie Myers	High School Counselors Businesses in Sherburne County Anoka Tech Info Technology Students	One on one intro Cascading Interview	20 20	ATC Info Tech Students

Teresa Truckenbrod Lois Hippen	Nursing ATC Board Athletic Event ARCC	Survey In person interview	25-30 25-30	ATC Nursing Board

Zakia Robbins Jon Olson Kimberly Roan	Anoka Chamber of Commerce Mfg. Cohort CSS Students	Qualitative Electronic Survey Design	25-30 mfgs. 60 students

Will Bear Donald Lewis	Staff - CR, Anoka, Cambridge	Carousel/S.W.O.T.	50 x 3 campuses	Staff CC Staff CR a.m. Staff CR p.m. Staff ATC a.m. Staff ATC p.m.

Dawn Alexander-Payne Mark Widdel Bonnie Boese	Students, Rotary & Community (Braham, Cambridge, Princeton, North Branch, Ogilvie, etc.) Students (Cambridge)	Survey (electronic), carousel, one on one interview design	200+	Community Rotary Barriers to Complete Barriers to Success Employer Survey Interest in Degree Students (Cambridge)

Anne Klein Barbara Prince	Legislators (2) Jim Rostberg VA Services Office, Cambridge	1 on 1 interviews	3 each time	Jim Rostberg Pine Co. residents

Laura Cleveland Jay Boyle	ATC Alumni Business H.E.I.P. & Government	Survey Carousel/S.W.O.T.	35-40 30-50	H.E.I.P. & Gov

Lisa Glendower Belinda Mulligan	High School students High School parents	Survey 1 on 1 interviews	50 30	STEP HS students HS Parents

Andy Aspaas Noah Strom	Biofuels - Evercat Pres. ATC Students	Round table interview Carousel in ATC cafeteria	5 30-50	EverCat ATC Students

Brandy Eddings Melissa Bergstrom	ABE at ARCC & ATC (staff & students) Alumni/students (chorale)	TBD	5-30 10-30	CC ABE CR ABE Chorale

Strategic Planning Task Force	Faculty	S.W.O.T.	400	Faculty

Jennifer Liberty-Clark Andy Aspaas Jay Boyle	CR Student Government Cambridge Student Government ATC Student Government	S.W.O.T. S.W.O.T. S.W.O.T.		CR SG Cambridge SG ATC SG

Andrew Aspaas Nora Morris	President's Council			President's Council

Sense Making

Please review the Planning Task Force Sense Making Day results.

Partnerships/Relationships	Focus on Quality	Identity	Revolutionize Student Services	Visibility/Public Image
Community Partnerships	High Quality	Who are we? Who determines this? How do we determine this? Can't be all things to all people	Start where the students are	Visibility

Other-Oriented Focus-K-12 Students - Business Partners	Quality matters: Do it well or don't do it at all	Define Alignment	Promote and improve career exploration and advising	How can we improve our public image?

Establishing/ Nurturing internal and external relationships	Quality Advising across campus (Involve faculty)	Narrow our Missions	Use a delivery method that is appropriate for the student (communication)

Partnerships, community connections, and transitions	Institutional research "decisions" based on data	Knowing strengths leveraging (marketing) our distinctiveness	Emphasis on personal attention

Inclusive		Leverage expertise	Clearly defined and well-articulated pathways

			Seamless mobility

Vision Conference

Review the final Vision Statement Approved May 2014

May 19th the Strategic Planning Task Force and invited guests reviewed a draft of the Strategic Plan Vision Statement - the statement that was reviewed may be viewed by clicking here: Draft Vision Statement

The Strategic Planning Task Force and invited guests were asked to review the Vision Statement draft and make comments - all of the comments made may be reviewed here:

Vision Statement (draft) comments

Open Houses

Attendees from all three campuses provided feedback on the Strategic Plan Goals and Objectives, please review the feedback below.

Planning Process

Data Gathering

Sense Making

Vision Conference

Open Houses

Strategic Plan Goals and Objectives Feedback